IT & AI Meet Innovation

Own Your Stack

Are You Going To Own The Most Profitable Portion Of Your Business 5 Years From Now Or Are You Going To Give It Away?

About us

We offer full stack consulting services that will improve your business and your bottom line more than anyone else in the industry can. Every single member of our team is a full stack generalist. From Python, to SQL, to Javascript, and HTML+CSS, we do it all. Whether you want your own app, want to assess your tech stack, or want to talk AI, we specialize in reducing IT costs, and generating profits from your IT department.

I currently have over 30 books available on Amazon related to every aspect of Artificial Intelligence. From Development, to Mathemetics, to Philosophy. 

I currently offer over 30 courses related to AI and Machine Learning on Udemy. Several of them are 100% free courses. 


In the realm of digital communication, spam detection is a critical challenge for both individuals and organizations. The quest to accurately filter out unwanted messages without inadvertently blocking legitimate communication has led to the development of various approaches, each with its own strengths and limitations. Traditionally, spam detection has relied on either deterministic (rule-based) methods or AI-based approaches. However, a hybrid model that combines the precision of deterministic checks with the nuanced understanding of AI models, particularly BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), offers a compelling solution. This article explores the advantages of such a hybrid approach over purely deterministic or AI-based systems.


Deterministic Approaches: The First Line of Defense


Deterministic, or rule-based, spam detection operates on a set of predefined rules or patterns. For instance, messages containing phrases like "free offer" or "click here" can be automatically classified as spam. The primary advantage of this method is its simplicity and speed. Deterministic checks are straightforward to implement and can quickly filter out the most obvious spam messages without the need for complex computation.


However, the limitations of deterministic approaches become apparent in their lack of flexibility. Spammers can easily alter their messages to evade simple pattern-matching rules, necessitating constant updates to the rule set. Moreover, this approach struggles with the subtlety and context of language, leading to a higher risk of false positives (legitimate messages mistakenly marked as spam) and false negatives (spam messages that bypass the filters).


AI-Based Approaches: Understanding Nuances


AI-based spam detection, particularly those using advanced models like BERT, represents a significant leap forward. These models don't rely on specific rules but rather learn from vast amounts of data to understand the context and subtleties of language. As a result, they can detect spam in more nuanced ways, adapting to new spamming techniques without requiring manual updates to rule sets.

The challenge with AI-based methods lies in their complexity and computational demands. Training and running these models require significant resources, and they may still produce false positives and negatives, albeit at a lower rate than deterministic systems. Additionally, the "black box" nature of AI models can make it difficult to understand why a particular message was classified as spam, complicating the process of fine-tuning the system.


The Hybrid Model: Best of Both Worlds


A hybrid spam detection system that combines deterministic checks and AI-based analysis brings together the strengths of both approaches while mitigating their weaknesses. Here's how:


- Efficiency and Speed: By applying deterministic checks first, the system can quickly filter out clear-cut cases of spam. This reduces the workload on the more computationally intensive AI model, allowing it to focus on more ambiguous cases.

- Adaptability and Accuracy: The AI component, trained on diverse and evolving datasets, can accurately identify spam that doesn't fit simple patterns, adapting to new tactics used by spammers. This reduces the likelihood of false negatives.

- Reduced False Positives: The initial layer of deterministic checks can be tailored to minimize false positives, ensuring that only messages with strong indicators of spam are filtered out before AI analysis. This layered approach helps safeguard legitimate messages.

- Comprehensibility and Control: The deterministic layer also adds a level of transparency and control, making it easier to understand and adjust the criteria for spam detection. This can be particularly useful for organizations with specific requirements for message filtering.




The hybrid approach to spam detection, exemplified by the combination of deterministic rules and BERT-based AI analysis, represents a sophisticated solution to the challenges of spam detection. By leveraging the speed and simplicity of rule-based filtering along with the deep linguistic understanding of AI models, this method offers a balanced, efficient, and highly effective tool in the fight against spam. As spamming techniques continue to evolve, the flexibility and adaptability of hybrid systems make them an invaluable asset in maintaining the integrity of digital communication channels.

Want to see all of this in practice? Check out this free Google Colab Notebook I made to showcase this:


+1 661 699 7603

Name *
E-mail *
Address *
How did you find us? *
Message *